Goodness gracious, the way everybody on Lemmy claims to be anti-capitalist, the majority of answers better be “nothing”.

Edit: ITT: people offended at being lumped in with the rabble.

Afaik, people in industrialised countries are likely to be vitamin D deficient. However, any vitamin supplements should ideally only be taken if a doctor has told you you do have a deficiency. But I get that this is hard to accomplish in some places and it’s easier to just try on your own so no judgement, just saying.

What makes you think you’re deficient? Because a generally bad mood may just be the expected reaction to the Current Global Situation™.

And you propagate his nonsense further. His follower count (read: people who throw money at him) increases every time there’s any coverage anywhere.

Btw, what he’s probably saying is that having just one woman is weak and any real manly masculine man has multiple women doing his bidding. The way he phrases it is specifically designed to farm rage engagement because he’s very good at that.

Theory and practice quite frequently don’t align in reality and humans are spiteful.

Yep, good thing none of us has done that.

Yeah, I read that. I still reserve the right to reject your analogy because I don’t accept it as relevant or analogue to anything. You can’t go “don’t say these things that disagree with me” and expect me to shrug my shoulders and go along.

I mean, your analogies that fall apart at the premise don’t really help.

Yeah, that’s one way to (not) answer.

You start that “analogy” with the binary assumption. That’s where it falls apart.

And it’s ribbed.

Yeah. So “nearby structures” determine sex, not “size of gametes”. What are they nearby? Possibly nothing.

Man. The only reason to watch this might be Pedro. Maybe. Grogu is rapidly approaching Minion level.

You’d THINK capitalism would cause that to happen, wouldn’t you?

So sex is determined by what structures medical professionals expect to be there.

Cool, you’re only now even contemplating what I’ve been talking about for several posts. Ovarian agenesis, Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, anorchia.

The spherical cow does exist though, it’s in the teeny tiny slivers in the OP’s post.

So it’s not the size of gametes but some secondary structures vaguely involved in the development of structures that are involved in the production of gametes. Did I get that right?

Thank you for your concern.

This is still “you’re the minority, better follow the herd, just saying”.

You do you.