• volvoxvsmarla@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      7 days ago

      Making an AI meme of Luigi as a Saint is one thing.

      Making a painting and having it casually displayed in your room is a whole other level.

      Also, I can’t believe it’s already been a year.

      • Formfiller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yea I guess but my mom was destroyed by our cruel and heartless system. She’s gone now but painting this helped me reconnect with the glimmer of hope we all felt for a moment after this happened. It also helped process the trauma I myself went through as her caregiver not being able to access what she needed

        • volvoxvsmarla@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 days ago

          I am so, so sorry about your loss. I’m glad to hear that you were able to feel a beacon of hope last year, and that this painting was a way for you to cling on to it and feel it a little longer. I hope you find a way to keep holding on to it, and through that hope find the courage to not give up and try to support change instead whenever you can and have the strength and energy to do so. But I can’t even imagine how hard that must be. And most of all, carry the love you had for your mom in your heart despite the grief, and the disgust and hate for the system that led to her demise quicker than it had to be.

          I hope you don’t mind if I save that picture of yours.

        • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          Symbols are powerful things. I’m not an American, but something that surprised me with Mangione was how people on the left and the right seemed to support him. It was a rare case of example of political unity amongst regular people.

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            It was incredible how right wing pundits were so disconnected from their audience, trying to promote outrage while their audience would have been popping champaign of they could afford it

  • AsoFiafia@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    The drug I have to take to live costs anywhere from $4,000-$5,500/month without insurance. This is actually cheaper than what I was on before—a cocktail of 4 drugs, some taken multiple times a day, that was almost $10,000/month. I’m lucky(?) that there are a ton of programs that together cover the cost for me. Unfortunately there are hoops I have to jump through every month to continue qualifying for the assistance and have to regularly take time off from work to make the appointments. I’ve lost jobs due to this, but am currently working a position where my manager is happy enough with my work to fudge time cards to help me out.

    I hate this country.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      oh, it gets better. Baby born with Spinal and Muscle Atrophy? There is a cure! $2,500,000!

      They hold lotteries for doses, a few babies win, most babies die.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I genuinely think that in some third world countries, as part of the middle class, you can have a better life than in the USA.

    • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      7 days ago

      Something I’ve noticed is when untraveled people in the USA try to contextualize themselves with other countries they pick the worst examples they can think of. Favelas in Brazil or slums in South Africa for example. We do this to the point where our entire conception of countries (or in the case of Africa, continents) is the worst imagery we can think of. I think they genuinely don’t believe that, for all their troubles India, Brazil, Mexico, Nigeria, etc also have smartphones and big buildings and libraries and universities and laboratories, and educated people living decent lives.

      They also can’t see how the overcrowded jails full of pretrial prisoners, the barefoot children carrying buckets for water in Appalachia, the rundown schools full of illiterate kids, the impunity of rich private interests, the corrupt sheriffs and judges, and on and on, puts us in the company of the “third world countries”. Yes we have nice places too, but SO DO THEY. A broken society in the 21st century isn’t people living in mud huts, it’s children shitting in the street next to a glass skyscraper with LEED Platinum certification.

      • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        And it’s not just “overcrowded jails full of pretrial prisoners, the barefoot children carrying buckets for water in Appalachia” but the grad students in LA living out of their cars, or grandpa sleeping on a bus stop, or people in the Rockies surviving off roadkill and forage.

        Seattle tent cities/tiny homes make some Favelas look real swanky.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Logically, it’s not about how much money you make, it’s about purchasing power. It is irrelevant if you earn only $400 a month when you can eat well for $1 and pay $100 for your housing, you have free health care and education. That is the reality in some third world countries.

        • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          Espousing an old no longer relevant definition to sound smarter and be “right” is peak lemmy/reddit behavior. Third world does mean poor now.

              • Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                Strictly, technically every other way China is still third world. This concept of third world being poor seems to have originated from the common charity ads in the 90s and 2000s who loved the phrase, and from the American exceptionalism that thinks everything not American is dirty and poor.

                • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Being poor is the only way a country is third world or not. Being politically related to America is not relevant to the present definition. So no, it is not “technically in every other way”. It just is not a third world country, period.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          It used to mean that. First World was US aligned (or at least US friendly), Second World was Soviet aligned, Third World was not aligned

          Now though, First World means developed nations, Third World means poor nations, Second World has fallen out of use

          • Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Only to those ignorant of it’s meaning. Developing nations is what people mean. Like people say third world, third to what? What’s first and second?

        • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          No one really uses that word in its Cold War context anymore. It’s the common term for “developing countries” and the like.

            • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              You’re right that they either never learned what 1st-2nd-3rd world really means, or they forgot what they were taught in history class. Unfortunately it still is the main term to refer to poor countries even though it’s incorrect. Language seems to be biased towards the common meaning over the technically correct meaning.

        • Zerush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Spain isn’t third world, it already had shown the middle finger to Trump and also has few to do with Rusia. Third world countries don’t certainly mean people starving, the people there often have all what they need, but this, you’ll see few Ferraries there and chalets with swimming pool. Someone is rich, not necesarly because a lot of money, but because he need only few. We often enter in a rabbit hole of the consumism, spending a lot of money in things we really don’t need, we work like a dog to have enough money to pay a journey to Hawaii to recover us from the burnout, which we wouldn’t have working less, no needing this journey.

          • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Have you been to Spain? I’m not saying it is not better than where the US is headed to, but it’s a “western” country in Europe, with all the issues that come with it. Somewhat social market economy, but still suffering from the usual issues, including people driving Ferraris while others sleep on the street.

            Also, at least since Franco I don’t think anyone genuinely thinks of Spain as third world.

            • Zerush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Well, I’m from Spain, also in Spain there are People with Ferraries (few) and also poor people, but there is nobody without food, because Spain has a strong social system and free healthcare for everyone. Nothing, absolute nothing to do with the US, it’s the opposite in almost everything. Luckily Spain has also little dependency on the US or Rusia, so it is also not much affected by Trumps Tariffs or Rusian Gaspolicy. Trump hates Spain.

        • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          If you can eat well for $1 then it is definitely a poor country relative to the US. Differences in purchasing power are a direct result of differences in wealth.

          • Zerush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            I think that the US is a third world country, it’s rich but most money is used for weapons and to make richer the billonairs and big corporations, in the social and cultural sphere, it is one of the most backward in the world. Now with Trump the US is turning in a running gag for the most countries. A country where 40 milloncof citizen don’t have enough to eat at least 2 times a day, isn’t a rich country.

              • Zerush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                USA is an total dystopic country, any Banana Republic has more culture. US is only powerfull because use all the money for weapons, developed by foreigner scientifics. First world is anything else.

                You will say that the US is a first world country, it’s better for your health

    • ebolapie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      There’s a reason countries like Vietnam are so popular with digital nomads.

      • WALLACE@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        My dream would be to get a remote nightshift job and live in a house by the beaches of south Thailand

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Not really. Poverty rates are higher, yes, but many middle income third world countries do have sizeable and growing middle classes. They’re called developing countries for a reason. The image of war-torn African countries where everyone works in mines isn’t really representative.

  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    7 days ago

    Welcome to USA, I guess.

    In other countries, you could probably completely fill a fridge with insulin for $800.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 days ago

      If you need a lot of different prescribed drugs then £114.50/year to cover every prescription you have is an option here. Otherwise £9.90 each.

  • Devial@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 days ago

    If he wanted it to be freely available, why did he even sell the patent ? Just disclaim at the patent office. Selling is just asking the new holder to start enforcing.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      7 days ago

      They sold the patent to the University of Toronto, so they didn’t exactly sell it to a for-profit patent troll.

      But also, that was in 1923, so the patent has long since expired.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        They also don’t make insulin the way that he did back then. Not justifying the price hike cause the way its made now is way cheaper than it was with the old method (which was basically grinding up animal parts to extract insulin). These fucks are just profiting off of the suffering of Americans who have literally no choice but to use their drug.

        https://youtu.be/naqbi_qVoVY

      • Devial@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I mean, that’s better than selling to a private person, still feels weird, since disclaiming a patent is absolutely possible, and has a 100% chance of leading to the desired outcome, vs whatever small chance there may be that the University starts taking profits on it. Or even just sees themselves forced to sell the patent, because of potential financial issues.

        Yeah, the risk is small, but eliminating it in it’s entirety would’ve been easily possible, so it just feels a bit weird he didn’t do it.

        • squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Remember, the 1920s is long ago. Giving the patent to the equivalent of a non-profit organisation was probably better than disclaiming it, since it’s easier to have one large, well-known entity that will fight off people trying to re-patent it than to disclaim it and hope that no patent clerk ever lets a fraudulent re-patent go through.

          In 1920 you couldn’t just google for prior art when fighting a fraudulent patent.

          • Devial@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ok, that is a fair point I hadn’t previosuly considered. Though disclaiming a patent doesn’t loose you all legal recourse.

            If someone else tries to repatent it, even if it gets approved, you can still file a challenge against the new patent with the PTO. You (or anyone else, really) would also have a virtually guaranteed court win, even if someone got the patent through and tried to enforce it. All you’d have to prove in court is that prior art of the invention exists, therefore the patent is invalid and unenforceable, granted or not, so it’s unlikely someone would even bother trying to enforce such a patent. A previous, diclaimed patent, of literally the identical technology being on record is pretty iron clad and unavoidable evidence that the patent isn’t original.

            • squaresinger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Nowadays you just google for other patents and done. But back then, I guess that searching for prior art was quite a lot more difficult. Gifting the patent to an university so that they defend open access to the patent sounds like a more reliable plan.

              I mean, even nowadays patents are greenlit my patent offices even though there’s clear prior art (Nintendo’s recent patent for catching monsters in a ball in a game comes to mind, which Nintendo would have to have patented before publishing their first game with that mechanic around 30 years ago), and even today it’s really difficult and expensive to get such a clear nonsense patent invalidated.

              So difficult that e.g. Palworld opted to change the mechanic instead of fighting the patent.

              So I do understand why someone would instead gift the patent to an university under the condition that they keep access to it open, especially 100 years ago.

        • cøre@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I never heard of disclaiming a patent until just now. Maybe he didn’t know about or it didn’t exiat in the 1920’s

  • Wynnstan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    For Australian diabetes patients the insulin Fiasp is $31.60 on the PBS, but Americans pay $930, while the medication Jardiance is $619 to $698 in the US compared to again $31.60 for the 220,000 Australians who access it. (I’m on Jardiance)

  • bonenode@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 days ago

    Why can’t Americans mail order it from Canada? Is the US going to tax the crap out of it when it crosses the border?

    • BD89@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes they will absolutely fuck you on it IF they even allow it at all.

      You know, in the spirit of “free markets” and all that bull shit.

    • RabbleRebel@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      I believe there are some restrictions on mailing insulin across the border due to regulations and customs laws. However, there might be ways around it if you’re willing to do a little research and possibly pay extra fees.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      people have been crossing to canada for cheap insulin drugs, the same one made by the trioply insulin companies via driving. other healthcare options, like dental work or medical procedures, they will be seeking places like thailand, mexico, india(the cities that cater to medical tourism)

      • FatVegan@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        These god damn foreigners crossing the border to leech of developed countries. They really need to put that wall up.

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      couple of reddit threads suggest that this is something you can do, but you have to be evasive around american border guard later if you go in person

  • AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    In Canada it is still considered expensive, but not even close to $800/month. It’s only considered expensive because most shit like that is free or a very nominal fee, but repeated need is what it is.