It is a very good sales person. But he didn’t understood how could the network (or Internet) change the world, even with his Windows monopole. He had Encarta and lost it, without reusing it, to Wikipedia.

He sold his first software before it was even finished to his own unuversity.

He saved Apple to avoid an antitrust trial.

It’s just business right?

Thank you! Fixed :)

Are you referring to this? https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/344554/decorum

Google docs is a no-go. But I was looking at etherpad indeed.

Thank you. I’ll check again what it proposes.

Then I have to pick a system. I’ll check if I can play without a system or something which is out of our way.

I didn’t see that I could just create character sheets and adapt then during a session. Can you?

Self hosting the frontend is eas but since 2 weeks, the frontend doesn’t connect to the backend, a private company which updated theeir API.

Still thank you. I’ll check.

I would like to draw a table, add words and numbers, and that’s all. I don’t want to have to code anything. I am GM-ing Blades in the Dark, with Deep-cut, and some things we took from Fate and others. I want to be able to freely create anything, even in the middle of the session. We don’t need automation. I want simplicity.

Yes. The backend service they rely on has changed its API and they said that they have no plan at all to follow. I discovered them only after they left peerJs (an alternative, which is interoperable and open source).

Thank you but it isn’t self-host-able.

Yes, but it is closed source and I heard of plug in to add games and so… I don’t want to have a table for few stats and items.

Still thank you for the idea.

On you server: tcpdump -ni any tcp port <your server port>

You will know if your traffic reaches your server and to what it has to respond to.

It feels like NAT issue to me. Or DNS :D

Apologies for the delay. On the VPN termination point, you have to set the allowed IP addresses. On the case of a client, a /32 is enough. It means that only this IP would be receiving responses. A client with a different IP address would be able to inly send packets, not to get any back, thus not able to get a TCP session. I think it is enough and rhat no additional FW rule is needed.

Is Termux still up to date? I thought it wasn’t available on android anymore. Is it on something else?

You don’t really need forwarding as you don’t need NAT here.

A part of the filtering can be done by wireguard by setting the allowed IPs correctly. Just check if only one service is listening on the server port you’ll allow.

Now a question: all without tls right? ;)

Same situation here. But Signal is a solution (if you can’t self-host nor convince your friends to use something whatsapp-y).

And there’s no encryption at rest so you can do it yourself.