

Short of explicit developer lockout


Short of explicit developer lockout


I still bounce back to x11 over a handful of deal breaking issues I run in to every time I try. Screen shares are extremely low quality, barrier (vkvm software) crashes intermittently, and inevitably I run in to clipboard issues. After a couple of days I just want my computer to work again. I use Plasma
It’s a Frasier reference, listen to the intro of the show. The next line should be tossed salad and scrambled eggs, just similar enough to the chair name to have made someone want to make the meme.
Files are encrypted at rest, if they are not actively interfacing with the encrypted mount it is secure. If you encrypt your entire system it’s safe from attacks when powered off, but as soon as you’re booted in the machine is fully accessible.
Short of manually deleting .git you can always find any commit, you can walk backwards through your reference lof if it comes to it, the only real risk is throwing out unstaged changes.


I would not expect rsync to have frequent disconnects, no.


Do you have a reference for that? I haven’t seen any channels that saw noticable decline in non desktop viewership
I once tried to delete the .steam folder off of an hold SSD, but the .steam folder is a symlink :(


All the homies hate bilewater, actual dogshit even with the shortcut


Looks like a blizzard is in the realm of $6? I don’t go to DQ, but living in a region with many of them I can say gas is generally accessible for ~$2.50 so unless you’re driving something that gets 10mpg there’s basically no way to make buying two be worth it. I only have to fill up gas once every month or two because my car is a plug in hybrid and I rarely go more than ~40 miles in a trip so it’s unlikely I use gas at all. With free nights I don’t even really pay much to fill my battery.


Gas is pretty cheap


Wouldn’t you be incapable of enjoying the sun


Doesn’t exploding require combustion?


What connection do you think a third party is saving when using openid? Generally speaking the only thing the third party needs is your identifier which in most cases is just an email. It’s no more devastating for the user base for that information to be leaked than it is when they’re handling authorization themselves. I personally think using a government backed authorization platform is a terrible idea and something completely liable to be abused by those in power, but it would objectively be better than trying to have every single service store your personally identifiable information themselves.


??? This is just textbook sso/openid but backed by the government. There’s nothing intrinsically insecure about having third parties send you directly to a trusted government site for authorization.


Imagine knowing what people post on Twitter


Not a Windows user but this was my solution when I was
Relevant username