deleted by creator

Probably not even wearing a suit smh

Colorectal people of cancer all affects ages.

I use Things to Get Me. It was the most privacy focused one I could find and does everything I need it to.

Stardew Valley!

To offer a counter point: I’ve owned 3 different VivoActive 3 Music watches for about 2 years each. All of them had the screen stop working. Could be my bad luck, but I wasn’t super rough with them (never wore them in water)

It’s definitely a real thing, but not exactly ADHD related (except for how ADHD people seem to often have anxiety too)

A negative gum game, if you will

Or eyeballing it, accuracy could take a hit though /s

This is my go to, however I wouldn’t call it BIFL. The first one failed after 2 years after using it 6-7 times per day everyday. Second one has been good so far for about 1.5 with the same usage. It’s by far the best scale I’ve found feature wise and structurally, but I can’t see it living forever.

Wow people really didn’t like my question!

To respond to yours though, I’d say it depends on how much content there is! If a game can easily take 1000 hours with no degradation of enjoyment, I would pay $100 for it

Edit to add: I realize this didnt exactly address your question, but I’m not sure what percentage since it heavily depends on the quality and quantity of content

Genuine question, why is $100 too much for a quality game? Completely agreed on the micro transactions though

I think Schrödinger’s Razor is the reason I have an online shopping addiction

100%. The only way to never lose when you go first is to always start in the corner.

Ah even back then people were throwing out the instructions smh

Thought for a minute that the bearded dude was throwing up

1,540 C in non freedom units

I wonder if this new trend will stop some CEOs from forcing RTO. Harder to stab over the computer 🤔

As long as you’re equally prepared to be deconverted.

Totally agreed on this point! To have a fruitful theological conversation, all parties ideally would have set aside emotion and bias in order to pursue the truth. That is much easier said then done, but is something I think we should all strive for.

You have included a lot more here than I have the time to respond to sadly (hopefully someone else will) but I’ll respond to your last point:

How are you able to love me, and also let me be, even as you genuinely believe that “my journey” ends in eternal suffering? Or how can you expect me, to accept someone who can do that, as a genuinely good person?

I can’t say I’m a genuinely good person, but I would say that it comes down to respecting the persons individual autonomy. For example, if I have a friend who has a habit that I consider destructive, I wouldn’t join them in the habit, but my love for them shouldn’t change. I would be sad that the trajectory (in my opinion) would end with suffering but as their friend, I should lead by example in what I think is a better life and keep hoping that they see where I’m coming from. Plus, maybe they will convince me the other way on this or other topics!

My general life philosophy is to question everything. You will either end up with a more solid foundation in what you believe or you will have one of those awesome paradigm shattering events. Either way though, an open mind is required and I’d encourage you to keep listening to those you disagree with. You may be surprised!

I might be able to help here! Trying to save/convert someone can look a lot of different ways, but what almost never works is aggressively pursuing someone. The best way is to live by example and just engage in theological conversations when they come up, not by pushing but mainly by being curious and asking questions.

With this method it is quite easy to have friends from different belief systems. Everyone is on their own journey and sometimes it takes a lifetime, but being pushy is never a good option.