You probably would be, because again, I have seen him on multiple different videos making anti-union comments.
But, depending on how vocally he was supportive of unions in any clips you showed, I could be persuaded to think better of him.
But it would be insane for you to spend hours of your life digging them up for that purpose, which is good for you because I don’t think they even exist, so I’m giving you an out to pretend that they do.
Does that also apply to your claims that he’s pro-union?
Dude, get real.
Do you think I saved the video titles and timestamps for his anti-union comments?
I watched his content religiously for years, and it looks like you still do, which means I know you’re lying.
But I definitely don’t care enough about this to spend the next 8 hours digging through his old videos to find the various clips just to prove it to you on Lemmy.
Tell you what though, if you go find me proof of his pro-union stance, I’ll be happy to take that into consideration.
You just claimed Linus was pro-union, when all of us have watched the videos of him ranting about his distain for unions and saying they’re unnecessary.
Forgive me if I don’t take your critique at face value.
This is disheartening.
The only thing that I want AI for in video production, is fixing dubbed live action TV and movies.
It would be great if the native actor’s voice was used for the language dub, and if their lips matched the new dub.
I know we all hate AI, and for a great reasons, but this is one of the few cool things that I think were been really beneficial - and I think could get buy-in from actors, with a limited AI release for this express purpose.
We investigated ourselves, and found nothing wrong.
Oh I’m sorry, let me fix that:
We paid someone to investigate us, and once our payment cleared, they found nothing wrong.
He’s also vocally anti-labor organization and anti-union.
Arguably he’s also pro workplace sexual harassment, but hey, he made an apology video so that’s no big deal.
That wasn’t built around agentic AI integration.
This will be.
I don’t necessarily disagree, but the fact they walked back the original policy because it was so unpopular leads me to believe they are trying to save face by implementing a PITA way of enabling unknown sources, such as through ADB.
The reason why I suspect that is because even with the original policy change, they were still going to allow unsigned apps to be installed via ADB.
But I guess we’ll just have to wait and find out.
They reversed course, so it’s not an immediate issue.
But to answer your question, they would have provided an OS update to only allows app installations from verified developers, no matter the source.
To get verified developers have to submit identification to Google and go through a Google process.
So it wouldn’t matter if the install source was a third-party repo, or Google Play, the system would not have installed any applications not signed by a Google authorized certificate.
That becomes very problematic because it gives Google the ability to restrict applications outside of the Google Play Store ecosystem.
They were copying Apple’s playbook from the EU wherein Apple was legally mandated to allow third-party app stores, and in response Apple required all apps to be signed by an Apple verified developer certificate, no matter the repo.
And wouldn’t you know it, Apple either revoked or would not provide certificates to developers of apps Apple didn’t like, such as BitTorrent clients.
It’s systemic, and whether or not it’s perpetrated directly by big tech, they are the primary beneficiaries i.e. increased ad sales.
This is a problem that requires regulation, which means it will not be addressed meaningfully, as that won’t happen anytime soon.
Not entirely true, but necessarily false either.
Projectivy launcher for Android TV is great and will remove home screen ads, and provide a much more streamlined interface overall.
Apple TV is really nice though, clean, smooth, and stable. I honestly would recommend that to most people, especially if they already have Apple products.
There were backups!
Unfortunately, they were located three rows and two racks down from their source.
In their defense, they clearly never thought the building would burn down.
And let’s be fair to them, who’s even heard of lithium batteries catching fire?
This was a once in a millennia accident, something you can’t anticipate, and therefore can’t plan for.
Unless you’re talking about off-site backups. Then maybe they could have planned for that.
But who am I to judge?
I have no idea what you’re going on about.
It’s not a matter of betrayal, it was a video revealing another area of influence in society that is now controlled behind the scenes by private equity.
Whose work was I shitting on? I was shaming people who were down voting that very well sourced and informative video, that documented private equity’s quiet takeover of major YouTube channels.
Maybe you should review the comment thread and see if you meant to respond to someone else, because that’s the most charitable explanation I can come up with for your responses to me.
I didn’t single out any particular YouTube channel for individual scorn. My comment was in reference to that very well sourced video about private equity buying up / investing many YouTube channels, of which they provided sources for in the description of the video.
The video which made the accusations, not me, provided sources for all of the claims.
Did you even look?
Sorry, that was rhetorical, obviously you did not look.
Anyone down voting this should be ashamed of themselves.
Like deeply and personally ashamed.
The type of shame that follows them for the rest their lives, because that’s how scummy you’d have to be in order downvote someone shining a light on how private equity is buying out major YouTube channels.
Something that I was entirely unaware of, and appreciate your comment regarding.
I guess it depends on your needs, but given that they are CS students, they may want newer updates than Debian Stable provides.
I know snap is shit, but Ubuntu is still one of the default recommends for new users, but yes, my preference is Mint for new users.
Sounds like someone purchased, or otherwise gained access to, T-Mobile’s targeted customer advertising and marketing profile data.
Or, the kind of information that data harvesting applications gather, and then sell to data brokers.
I wonder if they have a grudge against T-Mobile, this is an early stage of a larger plan, or if it’s just for the lulz?
Like in a kennel…?