Documentation? Maintainable? Test cases? You’re too attached to old paradigms in a new vibe based world.
Why do you need any of those? If you need any new features, you just re-engineer your prompt and ask the AI to rebuild it from scratch…
Can someone explain how you accidentally rack up such a bill?
For example: You can deploy your Python script as a Lambda. Imagine somewhere in the Python script you’d call your own lambda - twice. You basically turned your lambda into a Fork Bomb that will spawn infinite lambdas
A lot of the times this comes down to a user error.
For example, very similar to your case, I knew someone that enabled Cloudtrail, and configured some things to have Cloudtrail logs dumped on S3. Guess what? Dumping things on S3 also creates a Cloudtrail that gets logged to S3 that Cloudtrail logs. Etc
Doing things like that and creating a loop can get you massive bills
They were streets ahead in their logo design…
We also got fully self driving cars in 2 years though, in 2016…
This feels like a personal attack
No one’s questioning why he’s sorting it twice?
No, not some internal company, just Microsoft being Microsoft. So all Windows pipelines. They also have Linux based pipelines so not completely all pipelines.
But given that a lot of people build dotnet stuff on Azure, the ‘windows-latest’ image is usually the default. So a lot of pipelines
That’s not a Discord bot, it’s a Slack RSS App / RSS subscription.
Event Source: https://status.dev.azure.com/_event/543117809
It’s pretty useful ‘for work’ because occasionally you’ll get notifications when parts of infra might be down (like your build server)
It’s more the fault of the implementation and documentation.
Yea sure. Though it’s slightly XMLs fault for allowing that kinda implementations. Every random thing is in it’s own obscure namespace with 20 levels of nested objects in different namespaces, and if you get anything wrong it barely explains what’s wrong, and just refuses to work.
It’s mostly WCFs fault. I just automatically associate XML with nightmare flashbacks of implementing WCF stuff
Uh-huh… ever tried to integrate with a poorly implement WCF service? Like communication from a Java service to a dotnet service through a WSDL?
I’ll take a json API over XML any day
At some I added logging to a thread pool, when it gave up on child-threads, it would be logging things like
“Child 123 is being aborted”
Not the best of phrasing for people that didn’t know what that was about…
That laser at the end should have been Java Technology™ ;
You point it at anything, and end up with a huge dumpster fire… Sounds like Java to me
Whatever you do, don’t use G2A and other similar CD key reseller websites
For indie games, sure, I always just buy those legit.
But some EA / Ubisoft game; I rather pay $5 on G2A than risk accidentally downloading a malware infected crack
Where does it end though? It’s a bit like infinite craft - but instead of combining resources you’d have to find an inverse for every emoji
It’s a bit weird how that actually works though…
“Which of these pictures are traffic lights?”
I’d hope with all the self-driving-(ish) cars coming out, any AI like that should be able to identify a traffic light, right?
I’ve started to prefer option A to be honest.
In C# I’m using Verify - So I prefer to just use Verify(state); and compare the entire state against a json saved state, instead of manually verifying every individual property
Me: building a fluent interface framework…
I already support aWrapperOf<T, T, T, T>
User: Can I have aWrapperOf<T, T, T, T, T>because I’m doing something weird?
Me: *sigh* god-damnit. You’re right but I still hate it.
O(n)? More Like Oh(No)
You don’t get it. This was made in GameMaker Studio 1.4, which doesn’t support a modulo operator. You know nothing about this specific framework. I have 8 years of experience and hacked governments. There’s no reason to update it now, because it runs on a smart fridge at maximum capacity.