-f in the chat
Natanael
Cryptography nerd
Fediverse accounts;
@Natanael@slrpnk.net (main)
@Natanael@infosec.pub
@Natanael@lemmy.zip
Lemmy moderation account: @TrustedThirdParty@infosec.pub - !crypto@infosec.pub
Bluesky: natanael.bsky.social
- 0 Posts
- 431 Comments
Natanael@infosec.pubto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is it completely impossible to do age verification without compromising privacy?
2·5 days agoBad terminology choice, I meant the cert issuer. Need to revise the language later. I was thinking of it in terms of who verifies your IRL identity. The issuer can only issue the cert after you met them and they checked your documentation, etc
Natanael@infosec.pubto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is it completely impossible to do age verification without compromising privacy?
3·5 days agoMore like getting a TLS domain cert from a CA both sides recognize, but yeah
Natanael@infosec.pubto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is it completely impossible to do age verification without compromising privacy?
4·5 days agoZero-knowledge proofs still require that third party but only once, to issue it initially. Then the user can issue their own proofs locally
Natanael@infosec.pubto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is it completely impossible to do age verification without compromising privacy?
101·5 days agoCorrect, as a cryptography nerd I can assure you that you MUST at minimum have a trusted verifier which met you in person at some point (such as whatever office you get your physical ID card at) and they have to have your information.
And then you’re trusting both Secure Element hardware and fancy cryptography where both must be flawless in order to protect the end user’s side of it, all while the end user now carries much more personal information with them than before
Have you seen mechanical music boxes?
The ones and zeroes and bumps and flat areas
That’s because it doesn’t, your brain does
Speakers do the simplest thing possible and literally just vibrate. A recording being played literally just recreates a recorded vibration. It’s a tiny choreography that your ears are incredibly sensitive for.
All the fancy stuff happens in our brains, after our ears has split up the sound around us into different ranges of frequencies (you can think of the hairs in the inner ears as tuning forks). We learn to recognize which frequencies goes together, and then we learn how the frequencies from multiple sources can overlap, and we learn what it all means
The real crazy part is how something as simple as sound can carry so much information and how reliably our brains can tell it all apart and make sense of it
Natanael@infosec.pubto
Linux Gaming@lemmy.world•Valve put up a new Steam Linux Runtime 4.0 with a move towards 64-bitEnglish
11·11 days agoThe runtime is a container with libraries. Proton always runs inside the container by design. The runtime ensures the software environment is predictable, Proton ensures Windows binaries can run (by handling Windows API calls)
Natanael@infosec.pubto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•A scam call center opened in the office next door. Who do I report them to?
31·13 days agodeleted by creator
I sold my Ouya and have an original Steam controller still
Natanael@infosec.pubto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Please help me under stand my spouse's gift and their hurt
5·16 days agoI’m guessing it’s a niche thing easily recognized
Natanael@infosec.pubto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Please help me under stand my spouse's gift and their hurt
18·16 days agoYou have to explain why in a much clearer way.
Explain that you do appreciate it. Explain that if you hadn’t had the prior thing you probably would have loved it. But now, it’s a change, and it’s a big change, in several ways, including the nostalgia factor, and you absolutely appreciate that this thing is newer and more expensive but it doesn’t YET make sense for you to make the change and because of that you don’t want to make the change.
And because of that, it will just be sitting unused and you don’t like the idea of it sitting unused.
It felt bad to you to not use a gift.
And that, wanting to keep what you have, not wanting a change, and not wanting it to sit unused, is why you suggested a return, and not because you don’t appreciate it.
I think you’ll have to explain the “not wanting change” bit the most, by explaining why you feel that way. Maybe try finding a similar comparison. Imagine you’d gift them expensive jewelry or clothes they feel they couldn’t ever wear, maybe something they couldn’t wear together with their favorite clothing. A bag that would only sit in a closet. A tool that does more, but is heavier or whatever. Whatever that feels relevant to them, that makes them understand why you feel like you don’t want to make the change, not yet.

How should you have initially responded? Hard to say without knowing the people around you, but I’d say it would’ve been safe to say something like “oh, I don’t know if I can replace the current thing yet, I like it too much, and it’s got so many years left”
In other words, tell her that the gift was indeed great and that there’s wrong with the gift except timing, and emphasize you do not fault her for anything, you’re happy she thought of it, you’re sorry your reaction made her feel bad, you should’ve communicated better, and you’ll make a change to communicate better.
Perhaps even say something like “I probably should’ve told you I wanted to use this current thing for much longer, I should’ve explained more about how I think about these things and how I plan”. Because your initial response sucked honestly, and you need to make sure your phrasing don’t make her feel she made a mistake.
If she really likes being able to give you gifts, and if she now feels uncertain about being able to give you future gifts (this is very likely, by the way!), you should consider implementing that “communicating better” thing - for example (you don’t need to do it exactly like this, IT’S AN EXAMPLE) by maintaining and sharing a list of your existing things plus a wishlist, with details like “don’t replace before” and “replace no later than” and “required specs: XYZ”. And if she likes feeling like she can put her own touch on it, DO NOT present it as “do exactly this”, but rather “you can take inspiration from this”.
Natanael@infosec.pubto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Your task is to blow a job interview in the first 30 seconds. What do you do?
5·17 days agoTry to set up the interviewer with my friend “who isn’t as bad as they say”
Natanael@infosec.pubto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Your task is to blow a job interview in the first 30 seconds. What do you do?
9·18 days ago“I’m the reason they changed the safety rules 3 times in a month”
Natanael@infosec.pubto
Technology@lemmy.world•Are you ready for a $1,000 Steam Machine? Some analysts think you should be.English
2·18 days agoEven as a Linux desktop it would mostly just be interesting for devs and people doing relatively lightweight 3D design work (especially because it will take a while before other distros support it), I don’t see it competing against regular desktops.
Any company who depend on their employees having a decent GPU will likely want to be able to upgrade/reconfigure new orders at will, and will prefer a tower, and they will prefer the quick repairability of a tower. Those who don’t are increasingly ok with using mini PCs.
Natanael@infosec.pubto
Technology@lemmy.world•Are you ready for a $1,000 Steam Machine? Some analysts think you should be.English
9·18 days agoRumors is that the original Zen CPU SoC in the Steam Deck was also the leftovers from another canceled project by “a major OEM”, so it’s plausible. Sounds like Microsoft planned a handheld Xbox much earlier, which years after the Deck turned into the ROG collaboration, could have been related
Natanael@infosec.pubto
Linux Gaming@lemmy.world•Valve reportedly cooking native Linux version of Half-Life: Alyx, optimized for Steam Frame VREnglish
3·19 days agoFEX will have a performance penalty for CPU bound games (not for graphics if it supports Vulkan (yay passthrough)) so native is better




Isometric 3D top down games