Thanks!

the more you disagree the more it is apparent, I vote to delete this violent meme

wow, what did you use for this simulation ?

based

The only thing even FFMPEG can’t attack.

could it be the foss and publicly fund research and training I wonder

a reminder that you do need an Antivirus in fact as a pirate. Oh People, stop listening to cybersec experts who spend their whole life using foss or buying legit software, they’re in a different world from us pirates.

Also a reminder that it happens to the best of us anyway.

Capitalism if it was actually driven by demand.

the problem is when you sign for a job, or postpone it, into a time when this hyperworkmode is required, but it doesn’t activate cuz this job ain’t one of those things that you get obsessed over.

because of daddy Stalin

😂😂😂😂 Che was a mood

:O

I wonder how many millennials’ parenting career she saved

You had to point it, didn’t you ?

Stop spying on my house. That’s creepy.

You argue for the martyrs to receive these prizes ?

I agree on this choice. Hilariously enough, it would’ve been controversial !

testing embedding gifs

somehow, I feel like this counts as concise

But after reading, Seems like your answer argues that open source federated alternatives are better than corporate social media. While I personally agree, the main subject of this thread is why the phenomena: “privately owned social media that seems to embrace us at first turns against us eventually”, actually more like “stops working eventually”. the subject is why this is inevitable, this paragraph is the main subject:

No matter how great a commercial platform might be, sooner or later it’s going to either disappear or change in a way that doesn’t suit you because companies must constantly chase profit in order to survive. This is a bad situation to be in as a user since you have little control over the evolution of a platform.

You mentioned Marxist theory. From what I understand, Marx or some other commie argued that the good capitalist who plays with the rules is left behind in the race (“If I don’t lobby someone else lobbies”) and the winners use all kinds of ways to create monopoly and destroy the ones slacking. Thus Capitalism leads to monopoly and kills competition and fairness inevitably.
I kinda get the impression that corporate social media turning against its’ users is inevitable in the same fashion for some similar argument. That’s what Lemmy seems to think like.

But, I don’t see it happening when I’m using Telegram, or when observing Valve’s behavior.

Now that’s what I was asking for