So you expect them to trash their career?

Yes.

They should not even be thought of as that, that is how you get people to think they can replace actual search engines with llms.

They really cooked that duck to cinders. Waste of perfectly good meat.

The thing is you don’t have to use it personally, other people will use it for you and present it to you, possibly without you knowing it. AI bot accounts, AI news stories, AI art and so on. It is already a big part of the internet and it will continue to increase regardless of whether we personally use AI or not.

Your personal financial situation is not really representative of the financial situation of Americans in general though.

For someone out of the loop, could you explain what it is? What is wrong with desktop linux?

What’s the black specks floating around in it?

Apples was used as well. And they definitely can be stored for a year under the right conditions.

But funnily enough scurvy was also called “the English disease” in some languages.

No reason to buy American snacks, lots of European alternatives to choose from in that department.

Unfortunately that is not how the figures really are. Way too many of those 8 billions will willingly simp and fight the rest of us in the name of those billionaires.

Plenty of websites are AI created, with more being created every hour, which I gather is what OP is talking about.

And there isn’t really any useful wait to filer those out, with only lots of profitable reasons for people to create more of them, and they will shortly be the complete death of the internet as we knew it.

No it won’t. There are plenty of people who will keep putting money into it because it is very profitable for them to do so. LLMs can create disinformation more convincing and at a rate no human can compete with. So scammers, political interests and other wealthy organisations will only keep funding it more and more.

The regular consumer is not the one who is going to decide whether this is a fad or not. It is being used, and will be used to a much higher degree in the future, whether we want it to or not.

And that is just one side of it. The other, and arguably even worse, is that the content being uploaded to the internet will become largely AI generated. AI generated content can be created at rates no humans can compete with, and there are plenty of incentives, economical as well as political, for malicious interests to flood any human made content with AI created disinformation.

That is also why the people hoping that AI is a bubble which will burst are wrong. There are plenty of interested parties which will keep it alive for very profitable reasons, even if it is the opposite of what LLMs were originally claimed to be created for.

“Newspaper which uses AI to write its articles concocts derogatory term for people who doesn’t use AI”

deleted by creator

Fuck no. Rather an incompetent politician than a hallucinating sycophant just telling you what you want to hear.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

None of your examples are examples of what it is good for, since they can all be done by other means.